Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A detention hearing conducted by a judicial officer to consider rebuttal evidence against the presumption of flight.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| judicial officer | person | 4 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00002240(1).jpg
This legal document, page 8 of a court filing dated December 30, 2020, analyzes the legal standards for a defendant's motion for bail. The court acknowledges that the defendant has met the 'limited' burden to provide evidence against the presumption of being a flight risk, citing her financial conditions and family ties. However, citing precedents like *United States v. Mercedes* and *Martir*, the court maintains that the presumption of flight does not disappear and must still be given weight, concluding that the new information does not alter its initial determination.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein were at Interlochen
1994-01-01 • Interlochen
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein flew to New York
Date unknown • New York
Jane's return flight, potentially aided by the defendant, which is a subject of inquiry in the Jury Note regarding Count Four.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event