Event Details

This document is a page from a legal filing (likely an appellate brief) related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001). It specifically contains the Corporate Disclosure Statement, listing various insurance company appellants (including entities under Fairfax, Munich Re, Allstate, CNA, ACE, Viacom, and AXA) and their parent organizations to declare stock ownership interests. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023363), indicating it was part of a Congressional document production, though no specific individuals or direct links to Jeffrey Epstein appear on this specific page.

This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses legal tests for sovereign immunity under the FSIA, specifically analyzing whether entities like the KDIC (Korea) and PIF (Saudi Public Investment Fund) qualify as organs of a foreign state or political subdivisions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into foreign financial ties or the 9/11 litigation itself, though no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein appears on this page.

This document is a page from a 2005 Federal Court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It details the dismissal of civil RICO and ATA complaints against several SAAR Network executives (Al-Awani, Ashrafs, Mirza, Unus) due to lack of specific allegations connecting them to al Qaeda support. However, the court denied the motion to dismiss for Jamal Barzinji regarding material support claims, citing his control over bank accounts and alleged financial transfers to al Qaeda, while dismissing the RICO claim against him. It also briefly mentions a motion for reconsideration by NCB (National Commercial Bank).