Event Details

Unknown (Past)

Description

Rule 33 Motion Ruling

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
MAXWELL person 1792 View Entity
Juror 50 person 685 View Entity
district court organization 595 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00021865.jpg

Legal Brief / Court Filing (Appellate) • 607 KB
View

This page from a legal filing (Case 22-1426) discusses a Rule 33 motion for a new trial based on 'Juror 50's' alleged erroneous responses during jury selection (voir dire). The text argues that the District Court correctly applied the 'McDonough' standard, finding the juror's errors were not deliberate and that accurate answers would not have led to a dismissal for cause. It also notes that Ghislaine Maxwell did not challenge other jurors who had disclosed histories of sexual abuse.

DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg

Legal Filing / Appellate Brief (Page 18 of 26) • 600 KB
View

This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It discusses a Rule 33 motion regarding Juror 50's erroneous responses during voir dire in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The text argues that under the 'McDonough' standard, a new trial is not warranted because the District Court found the juror's errors were not deliberate and would not have resulted in a strike for cause.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.

Date unknown

View

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied as moot.

2020-10-19

View

Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.

Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house

View

Early phase of the conspiracy where Maxwell and Epstein identified, isolated, groomed, and sexually abused vulnerable girls.

1994-01-01

View

Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited each other to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where they were paid.

2001-01-01 • Palm Beach residence

View

Carolyn testifies that Maxwell touched her breasts on one of the occasions she was seen naked in the massage room.

Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house

View

Filing of Document 82 in Case 20-3061

2020-10-02 • Court

View

Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order

2020-10-02 • District Court

View

Maxwell continued to call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
District Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 21:13

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00000019.jpg
Date String
Unknown (Past)

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event