Event Details
June 27, 2007
Description
Citation date for Searcy v. Paletz
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paletz | person | 10 | View Entity |
| Searcy | person | 10 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014058.jpg
This document appears to be page 79 of a 2014 legal analysis or law review article, included in a House Oversight Committee production (likely related to the Epstein investigation regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act). The text analyzes the 'Paletz' and 'Skinner' cases to argue that CVRA rights should apply during investigations, not just after conviction or charging. It critiques the Department of Justice's position by citing the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, which found that limiting CVRA rights only to post-charging scenarios is inconsistent with the statute.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Decision in Searcy v. Paletz
2007-06-27 • D.S.C.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event