August 10, 2022
Court hearing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Maxwell)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge | person | 227 | View Entity |
| Loftus | person | 198 | View Entity |
| Ms. Comey | person | 1419 | View Entity |
| MR. PAGLIUCA | person | 1022 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00016625.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the testimony of a witness named Loftus and the admission of an FBI 302 report. The defense argues for a live witness to highlight an inconsistent statement regarding whether 'Virginia' approached 'Carolyn' to offer $300 at a party or at a house in Virginia.
Events with shared participants
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
Deposition of an unnamed witness conducted by Mr. Edwards, with Mr. Pagliuca present as counsel. The topic is photographs taken by an unnamed male.
Date unknown • Not mentioned
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A witness, Meder, is questioned about a photograph showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The photograph, sourced from a CD (1B63) from the Epstein and Maxwell investigation, is admitted into evidence as Plaintiff's Exhibit 342.
2022-08-10 • Court
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding 'omission theory' and inconsistency in testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by court reporters)
The conclusion of a cross-examination of witness Dr. Dubin by Ms. Moe, an objection by Mr. Pagliuca, and the witness being excused by the court.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding a deposition document from October 21, 2009.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.
2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event