Unknown
Accuser-2 read from her diary on a NY Times podcast.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuser-2 | person | 25 | View Entity |
EFTA00029844.pdf
Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.
Events with shared participants
Alleged conspiracy to cause individuals (Accuser-1, Accuser-2, or anyone else) to travel for unlawful sex acts with Epstein.
Date unknown
Alleged "sexual abuse" of Accuser-2 and Accuser-3 by Epstein, in which the government alleges Ms. Maxwell was complicit.
Date unknown
Period covered by Accuser-2's journal describing interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.
1996-01-01 • New York
Alleged conspiracy and overt acts violating the Mann Act involving Maxwell, Epstein, and three accusers.
1994-01-01 • New York, Florida, New Mexico, London
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event