Event Details

Unknown

Description

Accuser-2 read from her diary on a NY Times podcast.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Accuser-2 person 25 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

EFTA00029844.pdf

Legal Correspondence / Motion Response • 258 KB
View

Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Alleged conspiracy to cause individuals (Accuser-1, Accuser-2, or anyone else) to travel for unlawful sex acts with Epstein.

Date unknown

View

Alleged "sexual abuse" of Accuser-2 and Accuser-3 by Epstein, in which the government alleges Ms. Maxwell was complicit.

Date unknown

View

Period covered by Accuser-2's journal describing interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.

1996-01-01 • New York

View

Alleged conspiracy and overt acts violating the Mann Act involving Maxwell, Epstein, and three accusers.

1994-01-01 • New York, Florida, New Mexico, London

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Podcast
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-12-26 12:22

Additional Data

Source
EFTA00029844.pdf
Date String
Unknown

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event