Event Details
January 01, 1984
Description
The Supreme Court case Press-Enter. Co. v Superior Ct. of California, Riverside County, 464 US 501, 511-12 (1984), which established that forcing disclosure of sexual assault details can justify closed hearings and sealed records.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice Burger | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Press-Enter. Co. | organization | 31 | View Entity |
| The United States Supreme Court | organization | 2 | View Entity |
| Superior Ct. of California, Riverside County | organization | 2 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00008986.jpg
This legal document argues in favor of allowing 'Juror 50' to intervene in a case to protect his privacy rights concerning a past sexual assault. It cites legal precedents, including the Supreme Court case *Press-Enter. Co.* and the Second Circuit case *United States v. King*, to establish that jurors have compelling privacy interests that justify sealing records on sensitive personal matters. The filing asserts that intervention will also allow Juror 50 to assert his fifth amendment rights before any inquiry is held.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event