Date Unknown
The trial of David Farse and other defendants.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| David Farse | person | 2 | View Entity |
| Barry Berke | person | 12 | View Entity |
| Mr. Schoeman | person | 14 | View Entity |
| RAYMOND CRAIG BRUBAKER | person | 8 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00010099.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of Mr. Schoeman, a lawyer and partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankl. Mr. Schoeman details his professional history, including his firm's representation of Raymond Craig Brubaker in a prior trial alongside his partner, Barry Berke. The questioning then focuses on a specific event on May 11, 2011, when the court read a note from a juror named Catherine Conrad.
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Direct examination of Mr. Schoeman by Mr. Shechtman.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Filing of Document 646-10, an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII), in case 13-1388-cr in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
2022-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ms. Trzaskoma allegedly informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue.
2025-11-05 • Unknown
Redirect examination of witness Mr. Schoeman by attorney Mr. Shechtman.
2012-02-24 • Courtroom
Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney.
2025-05-13 • Unknown
Alleged communication regarding a suspension issue involving Ms. Trzaskoma, Mr. Schoeman, and Mr. Berke.
0012-05-01 • Unspecified
Mr. Schoeman returned to Kramer Levin.
2009-01-01 • Kramer Levin
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event