Date Unknown
Judge Nathan declined to modify a protective order, which is described as a clear abuse of her discretion.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Judge Nathan | person | 619 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00019604.jpg
This legal document, part of case 20-3061, argues for the issuance of a writ of mandamus. It outlines the three legal conditions required for such a writ, citing precedents like 'In re Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, N.Y.'. The document asserts that all three conditions are met, specifically claiming that Judge Nathan abused her discretion regarding a protective order and that the petitioner, Ms. Maxwell, has no other legal recourse, referencing her request to Judge Preska.
Events with shared participants
Judge Nathan issued an Order denying Maxwell's motion to modify a Protective Order
2020-10-02 • District Court
Submission of Ghislaine Maxwell's Response to Letter Motions to Quash subpoena to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
2021-11-22 • Email/Court Filing
Filing date of the court document (Sentencing submission or transcript).
2022-08-22 • Court
A victim impact statement being delivered to a judge regarding the sentencing of Maxwell.
2023-06-29
An appeal by Ms. Maxwell addressing an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. (Case 20-3061)
Date unknown
Post-conviction bail proceedings.
Date unknown
Judge Nathan finding, three times, that the Government established Maxwell is a risk of flight and no bail conditions could reasonably assure her appearance in court.
Date unknown
Judge Preska declined to stay the unsealing process but stated she would reevaluate if Judge Nathan modified the criminal protective order.
Date unknown • Court
Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to use discovery materials in civil cases.
2020-08-17 • District Court
Order regarding Local Rule 23.1 issued
2021-07-30 • Southern District of New York
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event