Event Details

January 01, 2020

Description

The case of United States v. Purcell was decided, which is now cited as precedent for offering prior consistent statements to rebut inconsistency.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Purcell person 2 View Entity
United States location 4439 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00005576.jpg

Unknown type • 656 KB
View

This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government asks the Court to establish the conditions under which it can introduce prior consistent statements from its witnesses, particularly if the defense attacks their credibility in opening statements or cross-examination. The motion cites Rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the precedent set in United States v. Purcell to support its arguments.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The United States purchased St. Thomas, St. John, and Saint Croix as a defensive strategy related to the Panama Canal during WWI.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The United States purchased St. Thomas, Saint John, and Saint Croix as part of a defensive strategy during the First World War.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands.

1927-01-01 • U.S. Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands from Denmark.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China.

Date unknown

View

Revision of the US-South Korea trade agreement.

2018-01-01

View

Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US.

2015-01-01

View

United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs.

Date unknown

View

South Korea is excluded from US steel tariffs in exchange for capping its steel exports.

2018-01-01 • N/A

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal case decision
Location
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:02

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00005576.jpg
Date String
2020

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event