January 01, 2020
The case of United States v. Purcell was decided, which is now cited as precedent for offering prior consistent statements to rebut inconsistency.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purcell | person | 2 | View Entity |
| United States | location | 4439 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00005576.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government asks the Court to establish the conditions under which it can introduce prior consistent statements from its witnesses, particularly if the defense attacks their credibility in opening statements or cross-examination. The motion cites Rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the precedent set in United States v. Purcell to support its arguments.
Events with shared participants
The United States purchased St. Thomas, St. John, and Saint Croix as a defensive strategy related to the Panama Canal during WWI.
1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands
The United States purchased St. Thomas, Saint John, and Saint Croix as part of a defensive strategy during the First World War.
1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands
The U.S. took possession of the islands.
1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands
U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands.
1927-01-01 • U.S. Virgin Islands
The U.S. took possession of the islands from Denmark.
1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands
Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China.
Date unknown
Revision of the US-South Korea trade agreement.
2018-01-01
Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US.
2015-01-01
United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs.
Date unknown
South Korea is excluded from US steel tariffs in exchange for capping its steel exports.
2018-01-01 • N/A
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event