Event Details
December 01, 2025
Description
Avalanche of work to finalize tax shelter transactions by year end.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrie Yackee | person | 27 | View Entity |
| Mr. Parse | person | 57 | View Entity |
| Sandra Burnside | person | 5 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010178.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript, filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), though the content appears to stem from a separate tax fraud case involving Deutsche Bank (likely U.S. v. Daugerdas/Parse). The text details a closing argument or legal submission regarding 'tax shelter transactions' designed to defraud the IRS, specifically highlighting the roles of Deutsche Bank employees Mr. Parse and Carrie Yackee, and referencing testimony from Paul Daugerdas' secretary. The argument asserts that Parse and Yackee were the only ones at Deutsche Bank who knew the 'full picture' of the fraud.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Fax sent from Carrie Yackee to Nicole Bencik.
2001-03-13
Email sent from Carrie Yackee to Sheila D. Denzler.
2002-02-11
Fax sent from Carrie Yackee to Judy Gagnon.
2002-04-25
A jury deliberation resulted in a split verdict and the acquittal of Mr. Parse, which is the subject of the discussion in this transcript.
Date unknown • Jury room
Carrie Yackee gave testimony where she cited over a dozen instances of acting on David Parse's instructions.
Date unknown
Complex and varied transactions were effectuated to change the results of three sets of transactions for tax purposes for Coleman and Blair.
Date unknown
A future sentencing for Mr. Parse is mentioned to be scheduled for January.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Mr. Parse was convicted of three 'backdating' transactions.
Date unknown
Carrie Yackee testified that she acted at all times under the instruction of David Parse and that what were presented as 'Deutsche Bank approvals' were actually instructions from him.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Fraudulent backdating of transactions was committed to achieve impermissible tax results, in violation of the annual accounting rule.
Date unknown • Deutsche Bank (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event