Event Details
January 15, 2025
Description
Ms. Pomerantz questions Dr. Rocchio about his employment at Brown University, his title, responsibilities, and length of service, leading to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | person | 906 | View Entity |
| Dr. Rocchio | person | 187 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00014895.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, showing Ms. Pomerantz conducting a direct examination of Dr. Rocchio. Dr. Rocchio states he is a clinical assistant professor at Brown University's Alpert School of Medicine since July 2020, where he supervises and teaches psychiatry fellows. The examination leads to the introduction of his curriculum vitae as Government Exhibit 1.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Direct examination of witness 'Kate' in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the scope of cross-examination.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Cross-examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory studies they have conducted.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Court filing date of the transcript containing the testimony.
2022-08-10 • Southern District of New York (implied by case number and reporter)
Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and begins her direct examination, explaining the basic principles of memory to the jury.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding metadata in Word documents, specifically Government Exhibit 420B.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Direct examination of witness Loftus regarding the nature of memory, trauma, and confidence.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)
Direct examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz.
Date unknown • Southern District
Redirect examination of Stephen Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz.
Date unknown • Southern District
A discussion in court with the jury not present, where a witness is excused and procedural matters regarding inconsistent statements are discussed between the judge and attorneys.
2022-08-10
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event