Event Details
September 16, 2020
Description
Filing of Document 37 in Case 20-3061
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Government | person | 0 | View Entity |
| MAXWELL | person | 1792 | View Entity |
| DOJ | person | 2 | View Entity |
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | person | 9575 | View Entity |
Source Documents (3)
DOJ-OGR-00019359.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (dated September 16, 2020) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The text argues that the court order denying Maxwell's motion to amend a Protective Order is not eligible for interlocutory appeal. It addresses Maxwell's concern that her inability to use criminal discovery in civil litigation might lead to the unsealing of civil documents, potentially prejudicing her criminal trial, by stating she can raise these prejudice issues during the criminal trial itself.
DOJ-OGR-00019356.jpg
This page from a legal brief (Case 20-3061, dated Sept 16, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The text contends that Judge Nathan's refusal to modify a Protective Order is not an 'immediately appealable collateral order' and does not fall under categories allowing prejudgment appeals in criminal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00019361.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal brief filed on September 16, 2020, likely by the prosecution or a respondent opposing an appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues that the cases Maxwell cited in her notice of appeal are irrelevant ('inapposite') because they deal with third-party intervenors (like the press or the CFTC) seeking to modify protective orders, whereas Maxwell is a direct party to the case. It specifically distinguishes the current situation from *Brown v. Maxwell* and other precedents regarding appellate jurisdiction over protective orders.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel filed on behalf of Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell
2021-03-30 • 02nd Circuit Court of Appeals
A shipment discussed in court, sent from Ghislaine Maxwell to Casey Wasserman. The event is stated to have occurred in 'October'.
Date unknown
Maxwell taught Jane how to massage Epstein, which led to the abuse.
Date unknown
LETTER REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
2020-07-29
Filing or processing of the Reply Memorandum in Support of Third Motion for Bail
2021-04-01 • Federal Court (Implied)
The appeal by Defendant-Appellant Maxwell was dismissed, and the motion to consolidate was denied as moot.
2020-10-19
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Early phase of the conspiracy where Maxwell and Epstein identified, isolated, groomed, and sexually abused vulnerable girls.
1994-01-01
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
Later phase of the scheme where Maxwell and Epstein developed a stream of girls who recruited each other to visit Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where they were paid.
2001-01-01 • Palm Beach residence
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event