Event Details

January 01, 1995

Description

Victims advocates decided to press for a federal constitutional amendment.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Victims advocates person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg

Legal Scholarship / Evidence Production (Law Review Article) • 2.26 MB
View

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (likely authored by Paul Cassell) analyzing the history of federal victims' rights legislation. It details the failure of the 1990 Victims' Rights and Restitution Act, attributing its ineffectiveness to poor codification (Title 42 vs Title 18) and its omission from West Publishing's legal guides, citing the Oklahoma City bombing case as a key example. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp and the name of David Schoen, Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, suggesting it was part of a legal production regarding the CVRA, a statute central to the controversy surrounding Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Victims advocates met with Senators Kyl and Feinstein to decide strategy.

2004-04-01 • Washington D.C.

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
USA
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-19 22:10

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017639.jpg
Date String
1995

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event