Event Details

June 01, 1995

Description

Judges reject move on rape case involving private prosecution.

Source Documents (1)

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg

Legal Exhibit / Law Review Article Extract • 3.22 MB
View

This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Scotland
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:27

Additional Data

Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
Date String
June 1, 1995

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event