Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

A Rule 33 motion based on a juror’s alleged erroneous response during voir dire, governed by McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
Greenwood person 35 View Entity
McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. organization 23 View Entity
Juror 50 person 685 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00014868.jpg

Unknown type • 614 KB
View

This legal document discusses the application of Rule 33 motions concerning juror responses during voir dire, referencing the McDonough standard. It details the District Court's finding that Juror 50's erroneous responses were not deliberately incorrect and that Maxwell did not challenge other jurors with similar disclosures. The document cites several legal precedents, including United States v. Gambino and McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood, to support its legal arguments regarding the standard for overturning trial results based on juror honesty.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.

Date unknown

View

Date referenced regarding Juror 50's testimony/disclosure status

2021-11-04 • N/A

View

Juror 50 commented on Annie Farmer's Twitter post

2022-01-01 • Twitter

View

A potential juror (ID 50) answers a questionnaire to determine their suitability to serve on a jury.

Date unknown

View

A Post-Verdict Hearing where Juror 50 allegedly lied to the Court.

Date unknown • The Court

View

Voir Dire process where Juror 50 allegedly concealed material information and gave false answers.

Date unknown

View

Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.

Date unknown

View

A hearing where Juror 50 provided testimony.

Date unknown

View

A close, contested trial involving Ms. Maxwell where the key issue was the credibility of the accusers.

Date unknown

View

During the jury selection for Ms. Maxwell's trial, Juror 50 failed to disclose his claimed victim status, which is argued to have robbed Ms. Maxwell of a fair trial.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
legal proceeding
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:36

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00014868.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event