Event Details

This document is page 27 (numbered 26 internally) of jury instructions filed on December 19, 2021, in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It outlines the three legal elements required to prove 'Count Four: Transportation of an Individual Under the Age of 17 to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity.' The instruction specifies that this count relates solely to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the time period of 1994 to 1997.

This document is Page 14 of a court filing (Document 565) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 19, 2021. It contains 'Instruction No. 8: Reasonable Doubt' for the trial of Ms. Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text defines reasonable doubt for the jury, explaining that it is not sympathy or speculation, and instructs them on their duty to convict if guilt is established beyond reasonable doubt, or to acquit if it is not.

This document is page 60 of a court filing (Document 565) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 43 regarding 'Inferences,' defining what an inference is and explaining the jury's role in drawing them from evidence. The instruction explicitly warns the jury that they cannot infer Ms. Maxwell's guilt solely based on her presence at a crime scene or knowledge that a crime was being committed.

This document is page 70 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 19, 2021. It contains Jury Instruction No. 50 regarding 'Uncalled Witnesses,' instructing the jury not to draw inferences from the absence of certain witnesses and reiterating that the defendant has no burden to produce evidence.

This document is page 72 of 83 from a court filing (Document 565) dated December 19, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). It contains Jury Instruction No. 52, titled 'Use of Evidence from Searches,' where the judge instructs the jury that evidence seized by law enforcement was properly admitted and lawful. The jury is directed to disregard any personal opinions regarding the search methods and to give the evidence full consideration in determining the Defendant's guilt.