Event Details

Date Unknown

Description

The document discusses the nature of plea negotiations between a defendant and a prosecutor, specifically whether they can bind other districts.

Participants (3)

Name Type Mentions
prosecutor person 8 View Entity
defendant person 747 View Entity
USAO organization 691 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg

Unknown type • 698 KB
View

This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing that argues about the scope of plea agreements. It discusses whether a plea agreement made with a U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district can prevent prosecutions in other districts, citing several legal precedents like United States v. Alessi and United States v. Russo. The document uses Leslie Groff, an assistant to Epstein, as an example and analyzes factors such as whether other USAOs or the Department of Justice were involved in the negotiations.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.

2021-03-09

View

A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.

Date unknown

View

Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.

Date unknown

View

Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.

2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court

View

The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.

Date unknown

View

A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.

2020-07-30

View

Epstein's attorneys challenged the USAO's position regarding victim notification.

2007-12-01 • N/A

View

Conference call regarding the review of Epstein's devices.

2020-10-19 • Teleconference

View

USAO's decision to notify victims about eligibility for monetary damages under § 2255, implemented by letters after Epstein's state pleas.

Date unknown • N/A

View

Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.

Date unknown • Court

View

Event Metadata

Type
plea negotiation
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
3
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 17:03

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
Date String
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event