Prior to hearing
Civil litigation service attempt
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plaintiffs | person | 35 | View Entity |
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00001949.jpg
This document is page 72 of a court transcript from the case U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 10, 2020. The prosecution argues to the Judge that the defendant is a serious flight risk, justifying why they did not offer her the chance to surrender voluntarily. The prosecutor also notes the defendant's lack of candor regarding finances and references separate civil litigation where defense counsel refused to accept service on the defendant's behalf.
Events with shared participants
Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling
2005-01-01 • Court
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
Court Opinion Issued
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
Publication/Filing of this court opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765).
2005-01-01 • S.D.N.Y.
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Legal Opinion/Case Proceeding
2012-01-01 • Legal Record
Deadline/Scheduled date to docket redacted versions of briefings on birth certificates, GX-52, and the Government's motion to quash.
2021-11-22 • Southern District of New York (Court Docket)
Legal Filing/Opinion
2012-01-01 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event