Event Details
During Trial
Description
Protracted discussion regarding a jury note
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
| the defendant | person | 996 | View Entity |
| Counsel | person | 172 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00021013.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discusses a dispute over a jury note regarding 'Count Four.' The argument centers on whether the jury could convict based solely on conduct in New Mexico versus the required New York law violation. The text details a debate over the placement of a comma in the jury's note and the Court's subsequent instruction to the jury to focus on New York law.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Real Estate Purchase under fake name
Date unknown • Unknown
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
The defendant personally recruited Virginia while she was a minor.
Date unknown • Virginia
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The jury convicted the defendant on five counts.
Date unknown
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event