Date Unknown
Sexual activity and abuse involving Jane occurred.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021734.jpg
This legal document, part of an appeal (Case 22-1426), argues against Ghislaine Maxwell's interpretation of a jury note from her trial. The prosecution contends the jury's question about her guilt based on events in New Mexico was a valid inquiry into her intent, not a misunderstanding of the law. The document also refutes Maxwell's claim of insufficient evidence regarding her arrangement of a victim's (Jane's) return flight from New Mexico, suggesting the jury could have reasonably convicted her on that basis despite a lack of specific documentary proof.
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
Jane's first trip to New York, coinciding with The Lion King release.
1997-01-01 • New York
Jane's trip to Europe with her family.
1998-01-01 • Europe
The witness provided a statement to the government, which is the subject of the cross-examination.
2019-09-19
Cross-examination of witness Jane by Ms. Menninger in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10
An alleged encounter where Ghislaine and Jeffrey Epstein met the witness. The details of this encounter are being disputed.
Date unknown
Jane was placed on at least one flight with Maxwell, as evidenced by flight logs.
Date unknown
The continuation of a trial, specifically the cross-examination of a witness testifying under the pseudonym 'Jane' by Ms. Menninger.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event