Event Details
Spring (Future)
Description
Potential retrial for defendants mentioned by Mr. Shechtman.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendants | person | 21 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009485.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on February 24, 2022. The dialogue involves 'The Court' and attorney Mr. Shechtman discussing the conduct of lawyers named Brune and Richard. The debate centers on whether the lawyers' 'lack of candor' was due to carelessness or a strategic decision to 'game the system' and conceal information from the court.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Discussion of the 'Sabhnani' case, a Second Circuit case
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
Concluding defendants did not present a flight risk
1990-01-01 • D. Mass.
The Government produced hundreds of hours of video surveillance footage dating back to July 5, 2019, as part of its discovery obligations.
2019-07-05
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
A status conference, originally scheduled for September 9, 2020, was adjourned to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely via videoconferencing. Audio access is provided for co-counsel, press, and the public via phone with an access code.
2020-09-10 • Remote (videoconference)
The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror.
Date unknown
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
One or both of the defendants in the indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts.
2019-08-10
A trial during which Conrad projected an image of being 'always head down, taking notes'.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event