Event Details

February 07, 2005

Description

Ruling in United States v. Bin Laden, where a court held that a single sentence in a New York Times article was insufficient to justify a hearing on juror misconduct.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Bin Laden person 20 View Entity
United States location 4439 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00021535.jpg

Legal document • 674 KB
View

This legal document argues that a news article alleging juror misconduct is insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. It cites numerous legal precedents from various courts, including the Second Circuit, which have consistently held that unsworn, hearsay, anonymous, or speculative reports do not meet the high evidentiary standard required to investigate such claims.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The United States purchased St. Thomas, St. John, and Saint Croix as a defensive strategy related to the Panama Canal during WWI.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The United States purchased St. Thomas, Saint John, and Saint Croix as part of a defensive strategy during the First World War.

1917-01-01 • US Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

U.S. citizenship was granted to the inhabitants of the islands.

1927-01-01 • U.S. Virgin Islands

View

The U.S. took possession of the islands from Denmark.

1917-03-31 • Virgin Islands

View

Intensification of the trade war between the United States and China.

Date unknown

View

Revision of the US-South Korea trade agreement.

2018-01-01

View

Reference period for calculating the 70% cap on South Korean steel exports to the US.

2015-01-01

View

United States subjected South Korea to steel and aluminum tariffs.

Date unknown

View

South Korea is excluded from US steel tariffs in exchange for capping its steel exports.

2018-01-01 • N/A

View

Event Metadata

Type
Legal case
Location
S.D.N.Y.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:56

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00021535.jpg
Date String
2005-02-07

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event