Event Details

August 05, 2025

Description

Filing of Document 803 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Defense counsel person 578 View Entity
court location 177 View Entity

Source Documents (2)

DOJ-OGR-00015094.jpg

Legal Filing / Defense Motion Response • 697 KB
View

This document is page 8 of a legal filing submitted on August 5, 2025, by the defense firm Markus/Moss in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, distinguishing Maxwell's case from *In re Biaggi* and rejecting a Florida public records case as irrelevant to federal Rule 6(e) protections. The defense concludes that there is no precedent for unsealing such transcripts in an ongoing matter and requests the motion be denied.

DOJ-OGR-00015089.jpg

Legal Filing / Court Brief • 738 KB
View

Page 3 of a legal filing (Document 803) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text argues the legal standards for unsealing grand jury records, citing the precedent 'In re Craig' and listing the specific factors courts must weigh when considering disclosure. The document footer indicates it was prepared by defense counsel (Markus/Moss) and bears a DOJ production stamp.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.

Date unknown

View

Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN

2021-03-23 • US District Court

View

A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.

2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)

View

The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.

Date unknown

View

A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.

2020-07-30

View

An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.

2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square

View

Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.

2020-02-04 • New York

View

Deadline/Scheduled date to docket redacted versions of briefings on birth certificates, GX-52, and the Government's motion to quash.

2021-11-22 • Southern District of New York (Court Docket)

View

Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.

Date unknown

View

In advance of a conference, the government and defense counsel proposed a joint schedule for discovery, motion practice, and a trial.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
US District Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
2
Extracted
2025-11-20 22:35

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00015094.jpg
Date String
2025-08-05

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event