August 05, 2025
Filing of Document 803 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00015094.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal filing submitted on August 5, 2025, by the defense firm Markus/Moss in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues against the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts, distinguishing Maxwell's case from *In re Biaggi* and rejecting a Florida public records case as irrelevant to federal Rule 6(e) protections. The defense concludes that there is no precedent for unsealing such transcripts in an ongoing matter and requests the motion be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00015089.jpg
Page 3 of a legal filing (Document 803) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text argues the legal standards for unsealing grand jury records, citing the precedent 'In re Craig' and listing the specific factors courts must weigh when considering disclosure. The document footer indicates it was prepared by defense counsel (Markus/Moss) and bears a DOJ production stamp.
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Deadline/Scheduled date to docket redacted versions of briefings on birth certificates, GX-52, and the Government's motion to quash.
2021-11-22 • Southern District of New York (Court Docket)
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
In advance of a conference, the government and defense counsel proposed a joint schedule for discovery, motion practice, and a trial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event