Event Details
May 24, 2011
Description
David Parse was convicted on charges related to backdating, though the jury did not convict on the conspiracy charge.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 1 | person | 133 | View Entity |
| David Parse | person | 96 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009515.jpg
This legal document, dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, argues for a lower sentencing guideline for a client. It contests the Probation Office's preliminary calculation, which suggests a 292-365 month sentence based on a $1.5 billion tax loss. To support its argument, the document cites a letter from a juror detailing the conviction of David Parse, suggesting his conviction was limited to "backdating" transactions and not a broader conspiracy.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Filing of an appendix (Volume XVI of XVII) in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
2014-02-24 • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Defendant David Parse’s Motion For Judgment Of Acquittal Pursuant To Rule 29
2011-06-07
A jury asked for a judge's clarification on legal terms ("willfully" and "knowingly") during deliberations regarding David Parse.
2011-05-24
A question-and-answer session (likely a deposition or court testimony) where Edelstein questions a witness about the identity of 'Catherine Conrad,' specifically whether two individuals with that name, one being 'Juror No. 1,' are the same person. The discussion includes the role of Theresa Trzaskoma and the firm's awareness of information regarding Juror No. 1's identity and responses to voir dire.
2022-02-24 • Implied to be within the Southern District, possibly New York
Multiple letters sent from Daniel Aronoff to David Parse.
2000-12-19
The government conducted a Google search on Juror No. 1 after she received a letter.
Date unknown
An investigation into Juror No. 1, referenced in a July 21 letter.
Date unknown
On the third day of jury deliberations, Juror No. 11 needed an emergency medical procedure and was excused, replaced by an alternate, and the jury was instructed to restart deliberations.
2012-05-16
David Parse swears to the document before a notary.
2012-08-03 • Illinois
David Parse swore to and signed a document before Notary Public William B Kavanagh.
2012-08-03 • STATE OF ILLINOIS
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event