Event Details

January 01, 1988

Description

Year of decision for cited case United States v. Oshatz.

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00003063.jpg

Court Filing / Legal Brief (Page 129 of 239) • 777 KB
View

This document page is from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). The text presents a legal argument distinguishing the current case from *United States v. Oshatz*, specifically regarding the enforceability of subpoenas for deposition transcripts and protective orders. It cites Chief Judge McMahon's finding that the Government demonstrated 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the modification of a protective order, unlike in *Oshatz* where the government was characterzied as 'trolling for evidence'.

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
S.D.N.Y.
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
0
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-21 00:56

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00003063.jpg
Date String
1988

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event