Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A discussion occurred regarding potential juror Catherine Conrad. It was discovered via a Google search that a suspended lawyer had the same name. A jury consultant advised striking her, not due to the suspended license, but because her status as a recovering alcoholic might make her prioritize personal responsibility over the government's burden of proof.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed jury consultant | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Theresa | person | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009323.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript page where a witness named Brune recounts discussions about a potential juror, Catherine Conrad, during voir dire. A colleague named Theresa discovered a suspended lawyer with the same name, and a jury consultant advised striking Conrad from the jury, arguing that as a recovering alcoholic, she would likely focus more on personal responsibility than the government's burden of proof.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Theresa began experiencing severe dizziness and other health problems.
2008-01-01
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.
0018-07-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event