Unknown
Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhibit 31-001.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR. TEIN | person | 444 | View Entity |
| the witness | person | 200 | View Entity |
| Mr. Leopold | person | 126 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00033008.jpg
This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript produced by Censor & Associates. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold asks the witness to spell a word for the record (the witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g' before being cut off), leading to an objection by Tein and a subsequent argument regarding whether a document (identified as Exhibit 31-001) was properly marked and identified.
Events with shared participants
A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001). A recess was taken during the proceedings.
Date unknown • Unspecified deposition location
A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their attorney Mr. Leopold present.
Date unknown • Not specified
A discussion was held 'off the record' during the deposition.
Date unknown • Undetermined
A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The filename '~0929104.TXT' suggests the date.
2004-09-29 • Likely Coconut Grove, FL
Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript.
Date unknown
The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding.
Date unknown • Not specified (likely a deposition room)
A legal deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein.
2010-09-29 • Unknown
The deposition or testimony recorded in this transcript took place.
2010-09-29 • undetermined
A legal deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold also present as an attorney.
2010-09-29 • Undisclosed deposition location
A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute centers on procedural conduct, interruptions, and the nature of objections, specifically attorney-client privilege.
Date unknown • Deposition Room (unspecified)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event