Event Details
January 01, 2013
Description
Clients were told the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe 1 | person | 52 | View Entity |
| Jane Doe 2 | person | 54 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00021441.pdf
An email from an attorney representing Jane Doe 1 and 2 discussing legal arguments in the Florida CVRA case against Jeffrey Epstein. The sender highlights a filing arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) is limited solely to Florida crimes and does not extend to New York, countering a motion by Epstein's lawyer Marty Weinberg. The email notes that the victims were explicitly told in 2013 that the NPA was jurisdictionally limited.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Jane Doe 1 filed petition for writ of mandamus.
2019-09-30 • 11th Circuit Court of Appeals
Doe, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 submitted a document on proposed remedies.
2019-05-23
The court granted the petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the panel’s opinion.
2020-08-07 • Court of Appeals
A panel of the Court of Appeals denied the petition from "Jane Doe 1".
2020-04-14 • Court of Appeals
CVRA petitioner “Jane Doe 1” filed a petition for a writ of mandamus.
2019-09-30 • United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Oral argument is set for the rehearing en banc of Jane Doe 1's petition.
2020-12-03 • United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Giuffre moved to join on-going litigation filed by Jane Doe 1 challenging Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
2014-12-30 • Southern District of Florida
Suicide Attempt (Aborted)
Date unknown • Isolated place
Rape of Jane Doe 2
Date unknown • Unknown
Court Hearing/Filing
2019-09-03 • Court (Southern District of New York)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event