Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A discussion took place regarding whether to keep or strike potential juror Catherine Conrad after it was discovered a suspended lawyer shared her name. The discussion involved weighing the potential biases of a person with a law degree and a recovering alcoholic against the government's burden of proof.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed jury consultant | person | 4 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
| Theresa | person | 22 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010002.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness named Brune is being questioned about jury selection. Brune recounts how a colleague, Theresa, found a suspended lawyer on Google with the same name as a potential juror, Catherine Conrad. Brune then describes a strategic discussion with a jury consultant who advised striking Conrad from the jury, fearing she would be overly focused on personal responsibility rather than the government's burden of proof.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
The witness, Brune, confirms having conducted many Grand Jury investigations in a past role as an assistant.
Date unknown
Theresa began experiencing severe dizziness and other health problems.
2008-01-01
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding a colleague's involvement in a trial and his own legal experience.
Date unknown • Court proceeding
The witness, Brune, was out of the country.
0015-05-01 • out of the country
The witness, Brune, first learned about the voir dire.
0018-07-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event