Event Details
March 11, 2022
Description
Filing of Document 642
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Defense counsel | person | 578 | View Entity |
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009720.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 642) dated March 11, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that Maxwell was deprived of a fair trial due to juror misconduct, specifically highlighting that Juror No. 50 and a second anonymous juror disclosed their personal histories of sexual abuse during deliberations, which allegedly influenced the jury's discussions. The page references a New York Times article from January 5, 2022, and contains a significant redaction in the footnotes.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
Filing of Document 172-1 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
2021-03-23 • US District Court
A status conference originally scheduled for January 14, 2021, was adjourned to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference is to be conducted remotely via videoconferencing software.
2021-03-17 • Remote (videoconference)
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
An endorsement was filed granting a request for a video monitor for defense counsel, signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
2021-11-22 • 40 Foley Square
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Deadline/Scheduled date to docket redacted versions of briefings on birth certificates, GX-52, and the Government's motion to quash.
2021-11-22 • Southern District of New York (Court Docket)
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
In advance of a conference, the government and defense counsel proposed a joint schedule for discovery, motion practice, and a trial.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event