Event Details

September 03, 2019

Description

A court hearing in the case of People v. Jeffrey Epstein where an attorney for the victims is addressing the judge.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Your Honor (Judge) person 0 View Entity
Unnamed speaker (attorney for victims) person 0 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00000708.jpg

legal document • 643 KB
View

This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, from the case against Jeffrey Epstein. An attorney representing Epstein's victims addresses the judge, thanking the court for allowing the victims an opportunity to be heard despite the defendant being deceased. The attorney also notes that there has been a suggestion for the court to investigate the circumstances surrounding Mr. Epstein's death.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A court hearing where an attorney is making an argument to a judge.

Date unknown

View

A court proceeding where the speaker, a convicted associate of Jeffrey Epstein, makes a statement to the judge.

2023-06-29 • Courtroom

View

Discussion regarding the schedule for jury deliberation in a trial, specifically concerning whether jurors should deliberate through the weekend and New Year's. The discussion is influenced by a spike in COVID-19 omicron variant cases in New York City, which poses a risk to trial completion.

2022-08-10 • Implied to be a court in New York City

View

A court hearing where the government argued for the pretrial detention of the defendant.

2019-07-16 • Court

View

An attorney for several victims filed a pleading to protect their anonymity in the CVRA litigation.

2015-07-24

View

A prosecutor is arguing against granting bail to a defendant, citing concerns about her financial disclosures and flight risk.

Date unknown • court

View

An attorney is arguing in a bail hearing, challenging the relevance of evidence presented by the government and outlining the legal standard for pretrial release under statute 3142.

2020-12-10 • court

View

An attorney presents a legal argument distinguishing an Ex Post Facto issue from a Sixth Amendment Apprendi issue, arguing a specific decision should be made by the jury.

2022-07-22 • Court in the Southern District

View

An attorney presents an argument to a judge that there is insufficient evidence to establish enticement related to arranging travel.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)

View

A court hearing where a speaker is presenting arguments about the seriousness of the defendant's alleged crimes.

2021-04-01

View

Event Metadata

Type
Court hearing
Location
Courtroom (implied)
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 15:47

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00000708.jpg
Date String
2019-09-03

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event