Event Details
Future (relative to doc)
Description
Affidavit signing/notarization for defendant.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| notary public | person | 2 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
EFTA00021549.pdf
An email chain from August 2, 2019, between Defense Counsel (Garden City, NY) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The discussion concerns the filing of motions related to cell tower data and statements to police. The Defense seeks to file under seal to protect 'cooperating witnesses' and statements, while the Government argues that statements to law enforcement are not 'sensitive' under the protective order. The Government also reprimands the Defense for previously filing sensitive exhibits publicly in error. Additionally, the Defense notes logistical issues with having the defendant sign an affidavit at the MCC without their own team acting as witnesses.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein were at Interlochen
1994-01-01 • Interlochen
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein flew to New York
Date unknown • New York
Jane's return flight, potentially aided by the defendant, which is a subject of inquiry in the Jury Note regarding Count Four.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event