Event Details
May 01, 2011
Description
Following a note from Juror Conrad, Trzaskoma and others at her firm re-examined the issue, finding suspension orders and a Westlaw profile. After an initial belief they were the same person, Trzaskoma concluded they were not, based on contradictions in their profiles.
Participants (2)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trzaskoma | person | 29 | View Entity |
| A paralegal | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010131.jpg
This legal document details the events of March and May 2011 concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. The firm's lawyers, led by Trzaskoma, investigated whether a juror named Conrad was the same person as a suspended Bronx lawyer with the same name. After reviewing evidence such as voir dire answers and a Westlaw profile, they concluded the two were different people and, lacking actual knowledge or strong suspicion, had no ethical duty to disclose their findings to the court.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A telephone conference was held where the Court questioned the defendants about their knowledge of issues with Juror Conrad.
0015-07-01
The Court held a telephone conference to inquire about the defendants' knowledge of facts concerning Juror Conrad.
2025-11-07
Trzaskoma discovered a 2010 court order suspending a Bronx lawyer with the same name as Juror Conrad. Lawyers at Brune & Richard decided the juror and lawyer were not the same person based on contradictory voir dire answers.
2011-03-01
Trzaskoma discussed the issue of Juror Conrad's identity with Brune and Edelstein. All three concluded that the juror was not the suspended lawyer and therefore did not need to present the information to the Court.
2011-05-01
Court proceeding date listed in header.
2012-02-15 • Southern District (likely SDNY)
Trzaskoma discovers a 2010 court order suspending a Bronx lawyer named Conrad; lawyers decide to await voir dire answers.
2011-03-01 • Court/Office
Juror Conrad sends a note regarding vicarious liability; lawyers reinvestigate potential identity match with suspended lawyer but conclude they are different people.
2011-05-01 • Court/Office
Submission of a letter by Trzaskoma to the Court regarding juror information.
0021-07-01 • Court
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event