Event Details
July 30, 2020
Description
The Court issued a Memorandum Opinion & Order, ruling that government witnesses should not be limited in their use of materials in related civil litigation, based on a representation from the government.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| court | location | 177 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00001756.jpg
This legal document is page 5 of a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The filing argues that the government has violated the spirit of a Protective Order by its handling of discovery materials, particularly in relation to their potential use in civil litigation and a grand jury investigation. The defense cites previous assurances from the government and a letter from Alex Rossmiller, which the Court relied upon, to argue that a new request should be granted by the Court.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The defense at trial focused on the credibility of victims who testified against the defendant.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
Date the second sharing order was signed according to email recollection.
2020-02-04 • New York
Evaluation of Maxwell's appeal of a Protective Order.
Date unknown
Voir dire process where Juror 50 stated he had no doubt about his ability to be fair and impartial.
Date unknown
Jury deliberations during which the jury sent a note inquiring about the proper basis to convict under Count Four.
Date unknown
The document is an argument concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell, specifically regarding the application of guideline § 4B1.5.
Date unknown
Initial Pretrial Conference set to occur.
2019-12-06 • Court
The document discusses arguments and evidence to be presented at an upcoming trial, including the Government's intention to argue certain individuals are co-conspirators.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event