October 14, 2004
Court heard oral argument from Defendants regarding failure to state a claim.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arab Bank | organization | 18 | View Entity |
| SAAR Network | organization | 24 | View Entity |
| others | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Al Rajhi Bank | organization | 54 | View Entity |
| NCB | organization | 66 | View Entity |
| ICA | organization | 1597 | View Entity |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017846.jpg
This document is page 781 of a legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) from the Southern District of New York concerning 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details procedural history, specifically oral arguments heard in October 2004 regarding motions to dismiss filed by various Saudi banking, corporate, and individual defendants (including the Binladin Group and Al Rajhi Bank) based on lack of jurisdiction or failure to state a claim. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry, though no direct textual link to Jeffrey Epstein appears on this specific page.
Events with shared participants
Legal Opinion / Reconsideration ruling
2005-01-01 • Court
Acquisition of Interlace Medical by Hologix
Date unknown • N/A
Mexican government released list of 38 approved OTC cannabis products
2018-11-01 • Mexico
Projected legalization of cannabis for adult-use purposes
2019-01-01 • Mexico
Supreme Court decision regarding the broadcasting of Carlin's routine on Pacifica radio.
Date unknown • USA
Arizona Republican Party enacts a resolution declaring the US a 'Christian Nation'.
Date unknown • Arizona
First Iraq War
1990-01-01 • Iraq
Set up a Family Assistance Hotline within 10 days via an outsourcer
2005-01-01 • USA
Formation of Saudi American Bank
1980-01-01 • Saudi Arabia
FDA accepted GW Pharmaceuticals’ New Drug Application (NDA) for the cannabis-derived drug Epidiolex.
2017-10-01 • USA
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event