November 01, 2004
The judge determines that the offense in question occurred within a two-month window after November 1, 2004, and before early 2005, which dictates the application of the 2003 sentencing guidelines.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAROLYN | person | 1336 | View Entity |
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00021584.jpg
This legal document is a judicial analysis determining the applicable sentencing guidelines for a defendant. The judge concludes that the offense occurred between November 1, 2004, and early 2005, based on an evaluation of evidence like message pads, thereby mandating the use of the 2003 guidelines. The document then begins to address the defendant's objections to specific sentencing enhancements related to a sex crime conviction.
Events with shared participants
Carolyn engaged in sex acts with Epstein in exchange for money, arranged by the defendant.
Date unknown
The defendant conspired with Epstein to traffic Carolyn and other minors for sex.
Date unknown
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell, two of Mr. Epstein's friends, and two other girls saw her fully naked in a massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
Carolyn testifies that Maxwell touched her breasts on one of the occasions she was seen naked in the massage room.
Date unknown • massage room at Jeffrey Epstein's house
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
Carolyn's deposition
2009-01-01 • Unspecified
Maxwell continued to call Carolyn to schedule massage appointments with Jeffrey Epstein.
Date unknown
Carolyn testifies that she was photographed while at Jeffrey Epstein's house.
Date unknown • Jeffrey Epstein's house
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Carolyn gave a statement to the FBI about sitting in a kitchen where a chef asked if she was hungry.
2007-01-01
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event