Event Details
Annual
Description
Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) | organization | 2467 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012381.jpg
This document is a commentary from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes outlined in Sections 224, 231, 232, and 233 related to human trafficking laws. The DOJ argues that the proposed changes are unnecessary, burdensome, or based on a misunderstanding of existing laws and departmental procedures. The document defends current practices, including the use of a wide range of statutes like the Mann Act and collaborations with various organizations for training and enforcement.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ensure' regarding government-funded counsel for victims.
Date unknown
DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing conflict of interest concerns and existing procedures under 18 U.S.C. §3509(h).
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22 U.S.C. 7105(b)(2)(B) to allow OJP to better allocate funds for trafficking victims.
Date unknown
DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are included with HHS in the development of a $5,000,000 Pilot Program.
Date unknown
The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creating a legally actionable obligation for federal law enforcement.
Date unknown • Not applicable
DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill related to human trafficking.
Date unknown • Not specified
The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill concerning human trafficking.
Date unknown • Not applicable
The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil suit under subsection (c)(3)(A)(iii), citing potential for abuse.
Date unknown • Not applicable
The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking in Persons and Worker Exploitation Task Force', recommending its replacement with 'the Attorney General'.
Date unknown • Not applicable
The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable.
Date unknown • Not applicable
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event