Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The defendant proposed using ankle-bracelet monitoring and a private security force for bail.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| defendant | person | 747 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00000336.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 12, 2019, is a memorandum arguing against a defendant's proposal for bail involving home confinement, electronic monitoring, and a private security force. The prosecution contends that these measures are insufficient to ensure the defendant's appearance in court, citing numerous legal precedents that question the security, fairness, and practicality of such "private jail" arrangements. The document asserts that a private security firm cannot replicate the controlled environment of a federal facility and that allowing wealthy defendants to fund their own detention is legally problematic.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The Government opposed the Defendant’s motion for release on bail.
2021-03-09
A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.
Date unknown
Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.
Date unknown
The Court is evaluating the Defendant's flight risk and proposed conditions for release, such as renouncing citizenship and financial oversight.
Date unknown
A court document (Document 36) was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, outlining the rules for handling discovery materials.
2020-07-30
Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, specifically concerning the public disclosure of the names of Minor Victims.
Date unknown • Court
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein were at Interlochen
1994-01-01 • Interlochen
Jane, the defendant, and Epstein flew to New York
Date unknown • New York
Jane's return flight, potentially aided by the defendant, which is a subject of inquiry in the Jury Note regarding Count Four.
Date unknown
Defendant points the Court to civil law regarding plaintiffs proceeding by pseudonyms
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event