August 10, 2022
A legal argument during a court hearing regarding the admissibility of evidence for impeachment, focusing on Rule 408, a witness's personal knowledge, and the applicability of Second Circuit precedent.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | person | 1588 | View Entity |
| Jane | person | 608 | View Entity |
| The Court | organization | 2003 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00017692.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal discussion between a judge and an attorney, Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on the admissibility of evidence for impeaching a witness named Jane, debating whether the issue falls under Rule 408, and emphasizing the necessity of the witness's personal knowledge. The judge also elaborates on the binding nature of Second Circuit precedent on district courts unless overturned by a higher authority.
Events with shared participants
One of three flights shown to the witness, which may have had a passenger with the first name 'Jane'.
1996-01-01
The Court announced a 15-minute morning break for the jury.
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the order of witnesses for the day's trial proceedings.
2022-08-10 • courthouse
The jury selection process where Juror 50 gave answers that corroborated his hearing testimony.
Date unknown
The Government gave on-the-record assurances to the Court regarding investigative files.
2020-07-14
A discussion between attorneys and the court regarding how to respond to a jury note.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
A summation by Ms. Moe recounting Jane's testimony was filed with the court.
2022-08-10
The witness, Jane, hired an attorney, Mr. Glassman.
2019-01-01
Jane's flight from New Jersey to New Mexico.
1997-01-01 • New Jersey to New Mexico
Court proceeding regarding witness strategy in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE).
2022-08-10 • Courtroom
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event