Event Details

August 01, 2008

Description

Wild received access to the NPA pursuant to a protective order.

Participants (2)

Name Type Mentions
Judge person 227 View Entity
Wild person 46 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00004605.jpg

DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) Report / Court Filing • 1.22 MB
View

This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report analyzing the conduct of federal prosecutors (Villafaña, Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The report concludes that while there was no evidence prosecutors intentionally hid the NPA to protect Epstein, they failed to consult victims, leaving victims like Wild feeling misled and mistreated. The text details how Villafaña wished to consult victims but was constrained by management and concerns over creating impeachment evidence, a decision OPR criticizes as lacking consideration for the victims' rights and the fairness of the process.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

A legal proceeding where a defendant is tried, involving a jury, judge, and government prosecution.

Date unknown

View

Stages of a legal trial where a defendant's innocence is presumed and the government must prove guilt.

Date unknown

View

Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.

2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court

View

Filing of the court transcript regarding sentencing calculations.

2022-08-22 • Court (Southern District)

View

Professor Elizabeth Loftus is qualified as an expert witness in the field of memory science and begins her direct examination, explaining the basic principles of memory to the jury.

2022-08-10 • Courtroom (implied)

View

Courthouse closed on October 27 and 28, 2005, due to massive power outages caused by Hurricane Wilma, extending filing deadlines. The search warrant and inventory could not be filed until October 31, 2005, along with an order to seal signed by Judge Johnson.

2005-10-27 • Courthouse in South Florida

View

Direct examination of Mr. Schoeman by Mr. Shechtman.

Date unknown • Courtroom

View

The legal proceeding during which the case is presented. The document instructs jurors not to research any issues that arose during the trial.

Date unknown • courtroom

View

Start of a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), with the judge giving preliminary instructions to the jury.

2022-08-10 • courtroom

View

Sentencing Hearing Statement

2022-08-22 • Courtroom (Southern District of New York)

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Court
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
2
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 20:09

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00004605.jpg
Date String
August 2008

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event