Event Details
Unknown (Prior to filing)
Description
Special Evidentiary Hearing
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| district court | organization | 595 | View Entity |
Source Documents (2)
DOJ-OGR-00021864.jpg
This document is page 17 (labeled page 40 of 56 in the header) of a legal brief, likely from the government (DOJ), arguing against Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. It specifically addresses the District Court's denial of a new trial regarding 'Juror 50', who Maxwell alleges failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text cites legal precedents supporting the court's discretion to deny probing jurors post-verdict.
DOJ-OGR-00021811.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated September 17, 2024. It addresses an appeal argument by Ghislaine Maxwell, who contends she deserves a new trial because 'Juror 50' failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during jury selection. The text outlines the legal standard of 'abuse of discretion' and cites precedents indicating that courts are reluctant to investigate jurors post-verdict and grant new trials only in extraordinary circumstances.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
The District Court denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss an indictment.
Date unknown
Denial of Maxwell's motion to modify a protective order.
2020-09-02 • SDNY
District court's opinion in the CVRA litigation
2019-01-01
District court issued an opinion concluding that the government violated the CVRA by failing to consult with victims before entering the NPA.
2019-02-21
The District Court's judgment of conviction for Maxwell was issued.
2022-06-29 • District Court
The District Court denied Maxwell's Rule 33 motion for a new trial.
Date unknown • District Court
A trial where the Government presented evidence, including Jane's testimony, and the jury was instructed by the District Court.
Date unknown • District Court
The District Court found that Maxwell supervised Sarah Kellen, partly based on pilot testimony.
Date unknown • District Court
The Second Circuit issued a writ of mandamus in 'In re U.S.', reversing a District Court's order that directed the Government to produce oral statements from defendants and coconspirators.
1987-01-01
Maxwell's sentencing, where the District Court calculated a Guidelines range of 188 to 235 months' imprisonment and sentenced Maxwell to 240 months' imprisonment.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event