August 10, 2022
Filing of Document 749 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
DOJ-OGR-00018166.jpg
Page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on confirming details of a 'major renovation' at a Palm Beach property, including work on bathrooms, floors, guestroom molding, and masonry. The dialogue also establishes that architects from New York would fly down to Palm Beach to supervise the work.
DOJ-OGR-00018336.jpg
This document is page 235 of a court transcript index from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It lists the examination details (Direct and Cross) for witnesses Juan Patricio Alessi, Gregory Parkinson, and Michael Dawson by attorneys Pagliuca, Comey, and Everdell. It also tracks the receipt of numerous Government Exhibits (numbered between 201 and 721) into the court record.
DOJ-OGR-00018293.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Parkinson by attorney Mr. Everdell. The testimony focuses on a past meeting between Parkinson and Jeffrey Epstein at Epstein's house, specifically in his main office. They discuss a burglary incident where Epstein alleged that cash was stolen from a bag near his desk.
DOJ-OGR-00018180.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi, who is being questioned about his prior testimony regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning focuses on an event where Alessi drove Maxwell to Mar-a-Lago, allegedly for 'some form of treatment,' and waited outside for approximately one hour.
DOJ-OGR-00018273.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring a legal argument between an attorney (Ms. Moe) and the Judge regarding the admissibility of photographs. The attorney argues the photos corroborate a witness's 'blind description' of a residence's interior. The Judge expresses skepticism due to the significant passage of time (15-20 years) and the fact that the photos may depict 'movable items' rather than permanent structures.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event