October 19, 2018
A ruling was issued in United States v. Carton, which involved quashing a subpoena for government communications.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carton | person | 4 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00002894.jpg
This legal document, page 5 of a filing from April 5, 2021, presents the U.S. Government's argument for having legal standing to challenge subpoenas issued to third parties. Citing multiple court precedents (including Nachamie, Cole, and Carton), the Government asserts its legitimate interest in preventing witness harassment, controlling the timing of disclosures (such as Giglio material), and protecting its own communications. The document argues that allowing the Government to intervene is the only way to protect these interests, especially when a subpoena recipient may not be fully aware of the case's context.
Events with shared participants
A ruling was made in the case of United States v. Carton.
2018-10-19 • S.D.N.Y.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event