Event Details
January 01, 1948
Description
Martin Davis proved that word substitution puzzles are a class of non-computable problem.
Participants (1)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Davis | person | 94 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015948.jpg
This document is page 258 of a book or article titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?' stamped with a House Oversight Committee identifier. The text discusses mathematical theory regarding computability, specifically referencing Emil Post, Alan Turing, and the 'Post Word Problem' in relation to music analysis. While the document is part of a House Oversight production (likely related to the Epstein investigation given his ties to the scientific community), the text itself is purely academic and contains no direct information regarding Epstein's criminal activities or financial transactions.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Issuance of a report by 'Davis' that is critical of 'Leon' and the board, related to Caesars.
Date unknown
Nicholas Ribis predicts that 'Davis' would issue a report critical of 'Leon' and a board, referencing an article in the 'Post' business page about the 'Davis Report and Caesars'.
2016-01-01
Bank of America Merrill Lynch's '2016 Future of Financials Conference', where this presentation slide was shown.
2016-11-17
The '2016 Future of Financials Conference' was held, where management from USB provided updates on their strategy concerning regulatory costs, ROE targets, compliance, innovation, and M&A.
0017-01-01 • Unknown
The case of *United States v. Davis*, 139 S. Ct. 2319, 2327 (2019) is cited for the principle that courts must examine a statute's 'text, context, and history'.
2019-01-01
Legal representation of Angela Davis
Date unknown • USA
United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019)
2019-01-01
Joined Miles Davis Quintet
1963-01-01 • Unknown
Citation to United States v. Davis, which involved a statute defining a 'crime of violence' using an elements-based approach.
2019-01-01
The case of U.S. v. Davis was decided, interpreting 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3).
2019-01-01 • United States
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event