💰 Financial Record

payment

Transaction Details

Payer (From)
Payee (To)
Nektalov (in cited case) Linked to Nektalov (in cited case)
Description

Reference to 'distinct cash for gold transactions' in the cited case United States v. Nektalov.

Additional Details
Date string: N/A
Amount string:
Source document: DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00005832.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is page 49 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on October 29, 2021. It argues for the admissibility of 'Minor Victim-3's' testimony, stating it is necessary to counter expected defenses that the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) played no role in procuring girls for Jeffrey Epstein. Footnote 11 provides extensive legal analysis distinguishing this case from precedents (Cummings, Townsend, Mahaffy, Nektalov) regarding 'other crimes' evidence and Rule 404(b), arguing that the abuse of Minor Victim-3 is direct proof of the conspiracy rather than a distinct, unrelated crime.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein financial record