💰 Financial Record

payment

Transaction Details

Payer (From)
Payee (To)
Jane (Witness) Linked to Jane
Description

Settlement award discussed in the context of cross-examination questions.

Additional Details
Date string: Unknown
Amount string:
Source document: DOJ-OGR-00017690.jpg

📄 Source Document

DOJ-OGR-00017690.jpg
DOJ Collection
View Document
Document Summary

This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutors and defense attorneys argue over the admissibility of questions regarding a witness's ('Jane') settlement negotiations, with the defense arguing it proves bias and the prosecution objecting under Rule 408. The Judge intercedes by citing *Manko v. United States*, suggesting that the civil settlement exclusion rule (Rule 408) may not apply in criminal prosecutions.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein financial record