Relationship Details

GOVERNMENT Professional Defense

Connected Entities

Entity A
GOVERNMENT
Type: organization
Mentions: 2805
Also known as: Government of Australia, Government of the Republic of Cyprus, United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), Office of Government Relations, PRC Government, US Government (The Americans), Government Exhibit, Office of Government Information Services, Government / USA, Orban Government, Palestinian government, IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (IRS-TEGE), Hamas Government, Saudi Arabian government, Orange County, California (Government), Netanyahu government, British Government, American government, Pakistan Government/Military, Canadian Government, Australian government, Government of Ecuador, New Zealand Government, Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Gov't (Government), Government / DOJ, American Federation of Government Employees/Council of Prison Locals, United States of America (Government), US Government (implied by SDNY context)
Entity B
Defense
Type: organization
Mentions: 240
Also known as: Defense Counsel, U.S. Defense Department, Breaking Defense, Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Defense Ministry, Defense Policy Board, Human Rights Defense Center, DELF (Defense extradition Lawyers Forum, UK), Children’s Defense Fund, Dept. of Defense, Dept of Defense, Defense Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund, National convention of criminal defense attorneys, European Defense Agency (EDA), Kids in Need of Defense

Evidence

The document details an adversarial legal relationship where the Government is arguing against a motion and proposed jury instruction submitted by the defense.

The document describes the government and the defense as opposing parties in legal proceedings, both of whom may seek to use ex parte applications for subpoenas under Rule 17(c).

The document describes the government and the defense as opposing parties in legal proceedings, both of whom may seek to use ex parte applications for subpoenas under Rule 17(c).

The document describes conversations between the Government and the defense, and outlines a 'Joint Position' they have agreed upon, indicating a professional, adversarial relationship with the capacity for cooperation on procedural matters.

Source Documents (3)

DOJ-OGR-00002896.jpg

Unknown type • 841 KB
View

This legal document, page 7 of a court filing from April 5, 2021, analyzes Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) concerning ex parte applications for pretrial subpoenas. It contrasts the majority view, which generally disfavors such applications unless for trial use, with specific court precedents that permit them to protect sensitive information like trial strategy. The text cites several cases, including Weisman, Fox, and Reyes, to illustrate the legal arguments and differing practices among court districts.

DOJ-OGR-00005204.jpg

Unknown type • 560 KB
View

This legal document, filed on October 12, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, is a joint request from the prosecution (Government) and the defense to the Court. Both parties ask that only jurors with availability beyond the Christmas holiday be selected for the trial. The defense estimates its case will last approximately two weeks but notes this may change after reviewing late-night disclosures from the Government, which the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, had not yet received due to delivery issues at the MDC.

DOJ-OGR-00005838.jpg

Unknown type • 664 KB
View

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a portion of a government motion arguing against the defense's proposed jury instruction. The Government contends that the defense's instruction regarding sexual activity with 'Minor Victim-3' is wrong on the law and that the relevance of United Kingdom's age of consent law should be disregarded. The document also states that the Government has already provided the defense with discovery materials, including the identities of alleged co-conspirators, making the defense's request to preclude their statements baseless.

Mutual Connections

Entities connected to both GOVERNMENT and Defense

court (location)
Ms. Sternheim (person)
Ms. Comey (person)
MR. PAGLIUCA (person)
The Court (organization)
Mr. Epstein (person)
ALISON J. NATHAN (person)
Ms. Moe (person)
Mr. Flatley (person)
Dr. Rocchio (person)

GOVERNMENT's Other Relationships

Legal representative MAXWELL
Strength: 15/10 View
Legal representative Defense
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative defendant
Strength: 13/10 View
Legal representative Defense counsel
Strength: 12/10 View
Legal representative GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Strength: 12/10 View

Defense's Other Relationships

Legal representative GOVERNMENT
Strength: 13/10 View
Adversarial GOVERNMENT
Strength: 11/10 View
Professional Mr. Everdell
Strength: 7/10 View
Legal representative The Court
Strength: 6/10 View
Legal representative Juror 50
Strength: 6/10 View

Relationship Metadata

Type
Professional
Relationship Strength
8/10
Strong relationship with substantial evidence
Source Documents
3
Extracted
2025-11-20 14:20
Last Updated
2025-11-20 17:01

Entity Network Stats

GOVERNMENT 178 relationships
Defense 44 relationships
Mutual connections 10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship