Relationship Details

This document appears to be a printed email forward or transcript containing a satirical dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The text lists numerous political scandals and controversies associated with the Obama/Clinton administration (including Benghazi, Solyndra, the Clinton Foundation, and IRS targeting) framed as questions from Hillary, to which Trump repeatedly replies, 'No, the other one.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a document production for a Congressional investigation.

This document is a Bank of America Merrill Lynch financial research report titled 'Liquid Insight: Trump’s effect on MXN,' dated September 22, 2016. Authored by Claudio Irigoyen and Ezequiel Aguirre, it analyzes the correlation between Donald Trump's polling numbers and the value of the Mexican Peso, suggesting the currency was undervalued and sensitive to the upcoming US election. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010609' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee.

This document appears to be a page from a forwarded email chain (indicated by the '>>' markers) containing political commentary from the 2016 US election era. The text expresses support for Donald Trump as an outsider who can 'fix' the country and includes a fictional joke dialogue between Trump and Hillary Clinton that serves to list numerous controversies and scandals associated with Clinton (Benghazi, emails, Clinton Foundation, etc.). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025931', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.

This document contains a series of four charts comparing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the 2016 Presidential Debates. The data covers four states (California, Texas, North Carolina, and Florida) and tracks percentage points across the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd debates. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

This document is a post-election analysis from Washington Council Ernst & Young dated November 9, 2016. It details Donald Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton in the presidential election, the Republicans retaining control of Congress, and outlines potential policy agendas and political challenges, such as filling the Supreme Court vacancy. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.

This document is a political analysis report dated October 19, 2016, summarizing social media sentiment and winning chances following the 3rd US Presidential Debate. It utilizes data from 4.4 million tweets to calculate positive, neutral, and negative sentiment percentages for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, alongside charts tracking their performance across three debates and specific polling trends in New York. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.

This document is a data analysis report titled 'US Election Report' bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details sentiment analysis derived from approximately 3 million tweets collected from November 1st (presumably 2016), comparing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It provides positive/neutral/negative sentiment percentages, overall winning chances favoring Trump (55%), and a breakdown of projected polling or winning chances across various specific US states.

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or article titled 'Alternative Facts' found within House Oversight discovery materials. The text is a highly critical political commentary contrasting the 2000 election of George Bush with the 2016 election of Donald Trump, focusing heavily on the electoral college and Hillary Clinton's involvement in both eras. The author, a former columnist for the New York Press, recounts sending a letter to Clinton regarding her unkept promise to abolish the electoral college.

This document is page 14 of a report by Laffer Associates titled 'Game On,' updated July 6, 2016. It provides a political analysis comparing Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, arguing that Trump's lack of political history is an advantage, while Clinton's long career exposes her to 'negative selection.' The text lists specific controversies attributed to Clinton, including the Iraq War vote, Benghazi, her private email server, the Clinton Foundation, and cattle futures trading. It bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' document ID.

The document is a page from a House Oversight collection (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025923) containing a forwarded email chain or text. It features a satirical dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, where Clinton lists numerous scandals associated with her tenure and the Obama administration (Benghazi, emails, Clinton Foundation, IRS targeting, etc.) while Trump repeatedly responds 'No, the other one.' It appears to be a piece of political viral mail rather than a factual record or transcript.

This document is a presentation slide titled 'Live Feeds – US Presidential Election, 2016' containing a weekly report comparing sentiment analysis for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It features two pie charts showing 'Negative', 'Neutral', and 'Positive' sentiment percentages based on data collected between August 10th and 17th, 2016. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028994'.

This document is a presentation slide containing four graphical charts analyzing polling or sentiment data for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton across four states: Washington, Ohio, New Jersey, and Michigan. The charts track changes in percentages between the 1st/2nd presidential debates and the 3rd debate of the 2016 election cycle. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional document production.