Reems asked Dershowitz to argue his appeal; Dershowitz agreed pro bono.
Implied by the mention of 'Harry Reems' Deep Throat' in the title and the author's discussion of defending such cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017195.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz) discussing the legal defense of actor Harry Reems in the 'Deep Throat' obscenity case. The text details the prosecutor's (Parrish) motivations, Dershowitz's decision to take the case pro bono, and the strategy to win in the 'court of public opinion' by garnering support from mainstream celebrities and The New York Times. The page bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it was part of a document production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017171.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (dated April 2, 2012) of a book, likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific legal history and cases mentioned (Harry Reems, bestiality defense, etc.). The text discusses the evolution of the First Amendment, contrasting it with Charlton Heston's views on the Second Amendment, and lists the controversial types of speech the author has defended. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein case in which Dershowitz was involved.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein relationship